What does DVC moving to a pre-exisiting resort add?

Login to post comments
5 posts / 0 new
Kristen K.'s picture
Offline
Joined: 09/01/2011
Posts: 23803
What does DVC moving to a pre-exisiting resort add?

Adding DVC to an already existing resort complex is a smart business move on Disney's behalf. The construction is less cumbersome in expanding utilities, the guest services process is already in place, as are basic amenities like restaurants and recreation. However with most of the DVC expansions that have happened the resort got something more than a few new rooms in the deal. The DVC expansions have added more amenities to the properties such as additional restaurants, lounges, pools, bars, health clubs, and community rooms with significant points of interest.

I've been thinking about this Grand Floridian DVC expansion, and I must admit that though the rooms are beautiful, on the monorail, and have a magnificent view, I am very disappointed in the lack of it adding features to the overall resort. As far as I can tell, the only benefit to the resort of having the DVC property is that they added a splash zone to the already existing pool area. It seems like this expansion is adding guest room capacity, but not really bringing anything else to the party.

That means that the already very popular services at the Grand Floridian, will be more crowded because Disney hasn't built in any relief to compensate for the additional guest rooms. With the cost of DVC at the Grand Floridian (both per point price and in point usage) I must admit that I'm a little disappointed.

What do you think about this? Should DVC just be more rooms at a pre-existing resort, or does Disney have a responsibility to it's guests to add more amenities when DVC comes to ease the burden on the public spaces? When you buy DVC, are you buying more than just a room?

I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Emilio's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/23/2013
Posts: 339

Great point & I agree with you. When I visited their preview center a few weeks ago, I was dazzled by the rooms and failed to notice/inquire about these other usual amenities that come with new resorts (restaurants & recreations).

As much as I would like to own in that resort and have a guaranteed week every year, I was not totally sold on that concept and passed on it.

I am sure it will be a great success and a very magical place to stay, but I'll just have to visit and dream Smile .

finngirl's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/11/2012
Posts: 1072

We're not DVC owners, so I have no firsthand experience, but I don't think it's fair to existing guests or the new DVC owners if extra amenities, services, etc. are not added. It means more crowds for the existing guests, and DVC guests are not getting anything extra to make owning more attractive and "special".

After walking around the GF in May, even if we could afford to buy there, I don't think we would.

__________________

Diana

Time marches on. Eventually you realize it's doing it across your face.

RobynPrincess's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/14/2010
Posts: 2859

Kristen I am SO with you and have had the exact same conversation before with friends. It was one of the reasons we decided against buy VGF.

__________________

Our Very Merry 24 nighter Nov/Dec 15
Watson's go West May 15
The one with all the birthdays Oct 14 4 Big Birthdays and a Vow Renewal thrown in
The OMG trip June 14 30th Birthday present from the hubs
Girly trip March 14 A last min cheapy week
September 13 our first all DVC stay
TR May 2013 the last min bargain trip offsite
Oct 2012 TR with a cruise!big family trip featuring the beach club, AKL, the dream and a villa offsite
TR on a budget May - June 2011offsite condo
TR Sept - Oct 2010 big family trip in an offsite villa

WDWfanatic's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/18/2013
Posts: 356

I would think that, even though DVC is separate from the resort, since they share the same amenities, wouldn't that help out with the maintenance fees? Since they can dip into both the resort and the DVC portion for any maintenance or add ons?

I could be wrong, but I thought I had seen this explained somewhere.

__________________

Tammi